[e925]
░ armory · video-clipping · compare

Deepgram Nova-3 vs LR-ASD

Both in the video & clipping category. Side-by-side — pick the one that fits your stack tonight.

Deepgram Nova-3★★★★★
✓ loya-tested💰 paid🛠️ wire-up

The speech-to-text that actually gets word-level timestamps right.

rating
5
tested
✓ loya-tested
cost
paid
install
needs-wiring
stars
0
updated
4d ago
#transcription#speech-to-text#word-timestamps#diarization#paid#deepgram
avoid if

You only transcribe short voice notes — use free Whisper locally.

open the full entry →
LR-ASD★★★★
🆓 free🐍 sidecar

The 2025 state-of-the-art for 'which face is actually talking.' Fast, tiny, accurate.

rating
4
tested
cost
free
install
sidecar
stars
109
updated
1y ago
#video#active-speaker#python#research#lightweight#open-source
avoid if

You're not building a pipeline yourself. This is a research model, not a product.

open the full entry →

why it matters · Deepgram Nova-3

Nova-3 is the transcription engine behind every podcast clipper that ships. You upload audio, get back text with per-word timestamps, speaker labels, and punctuation — the three things you need to cut a clip on a clean sentence boundary instead of mid-word. Costs about 26 cents an hour of audio. Free \$200 credit when you sign up, which gets you through your first 700+ hours before you pay anything. Way more accurate than Whisper on real podcast audio.

why it matters · LR-ASD

LR-ASD is the newest open-source active speaker detection model (Springer IJCV 2025 paper). It tells your video pipeline which person in a multi-face frame is actually talking. Accuracy beats the older TalkNet approach and it's 23 times lighter — fast enough to run on every frame, not just samples. If you're building your own clipping or auto-crop pipeline and accuracy matters more than a pre-built library, this is the one to drop in. MIT, free, Python.

more video & clipping to compare

derived live from the armory manifest · same-category only