One-Shot Security Sweep Prompt vs Visual-Verify with Playwright
Both in the audit & qa category. Side-by-side — pick the one that fits your stack tonight.
One prompt that catches exposed API keys, SQL injection, XSS, and auth holes before you ship.
- rating
- 4★
- tested
- —
- cost
- free
- install
- drop-in
- stars
- 0
- updated
- 4d ago
You need a full enterprise security audit — for that, hire a real pen-tester. This is the 'before I push to prod' quick-check.
Every UI change ends with a screenshot. If it doesn't look right, it didn't ship right.
- rating
- 4★
- tested
- ✓ loya-tested
- cost
- free
- install
- drop-in
- stars
- 31,000
- updated
- 4d ago
You're shipping backend-only code or pure API work. Visual verify only matters when there's a UI to look at.
why it matters · One-Shot Security Sweep Prompt
Most vibe-coded apps ship with at least one security hole — an exposed API key, an unchecked input, a missing auth check. This prompt from hackSultan tells Claude to act as a security auditor and walk through the whole codebase looking for the standard OWASP top-10 issues. Returns a clean punch-list: severity, file, fix. Run it before every launch. Takes 2 minutes, catches the dumb stuff. Community-popular because it just works without any setup.
why it matters · Visual-Verify with Playwright
TypeScript + build passing does NOT mean your UI looks right. A page can compile cleanly and still render broken — wrong layout, overlapping elements, missing assets. The only way to catch this before shipping is to actually LOOK at it. On every Escape 9 to 5 UI task: Playwright screenshots at 1280x900 desktop + 375 mobile, verify before marking done. Caught ~12 broken layouts in Escape 9 to 5's first two weeks that tsc (TypeScript compiler) + build happily greenlit. The gap between 'compiles' and 'works' is wider than most agents assume.